Abdimedia Youtube

The people wanted more political freedom, which was not available at that time.

The Shah intervened in two areas: matters related to foreign policy and military matters and the defense of the country.

During the time of the Shah, dissatisfaction could be curbed by providing financial facilities to the people.

Mehrdad Khansari: Our country, at the time when Mohammad Reza Shah came to the throne, was a poor country.

It is very clear that the Islamic Republic is at one of the most sensitive historical junctures. Therefore, we are going to discuss an issue that is important for the future of Iran, and the topic of our conversation is the structure of power in Iran. We know that after the attacks that took place in recent months, and after the killing of Ayatollah Khamenei and the transfer of leadership in a very strange and extraordinary process to his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, many now believe that the Islamic Republic has entered its third generation. Although to this day, we have not seen any live voice, image, photo, or even a live signature from the new leader. Has Iran entered the era of a military-security government? And can the new architecture of power stabilize the Islamic Republic system and the nascent system of Mojtaba Khamenei, or will new crises arise?

Mehrdad Khansari: The biggest weakness of the Islamic Republic is the lack of development and the creation of public dissatisfaction.

The skill he had in construction, he did not have in "crisis management".

If the government continues its practice of raids, imprisonments, and house arrests, what we were worried about happening through a foreign attack will instead occur through "social collapse."

We are in an emergency situation in which the law is not observed.

Hossein Bayat: When the leader of the Islamic Republic is assassinated in the first second of the war, it means we are naturally in an emergency situation.

The theoretical foundations of the Islamic Republic are fraught with conflict and contradiction.

If there is to be a discussion of "transition," then the issue of "war" — which has already been defeated — must be raised again.

If you had understood, you wouldn't have relied one bit on foreign interference!

The binary of "people vs. government" is wrong and has led to war.

It cannot be said that those who are involved in the country's defense mechanism are necessarily the same people who suppressed the people in January

Watch on the Abdi Media YouTube channel.

Outside the country, the level of violence has risen so high that anyone who speaks "anti-war" cannot feel safe.

Under these circumstances, someone like Reza Pahlavi can become "sacralized."

They Lack the Authenticity, Foundations, and Ideals of a Genuine Revolution

The Pahlavi model of governance is based on a paternalistic and patriarchal style of rule.

Free speech lives in safety

This entire affair of war is a "business."

In no movement have we had such facilitation for the issue of mass killing.

This creature and her entire campaign view the existence of the Iranian human through a consumerist lens.

In December, an additional layer was added to the government's repression, and that was due to the role played by Pahlavi.

The "dead ends" were translated into "insoluble" issues for the people

We need people who can stand against the waves.
 

The path ahead does not lead to liberation.
 

Individual leadership is not desirable because such an event occurred in the Islamic Revolution.

From the YouTube channel of Abdi Media

The strength of revolutions is proportional to the strength of their leaders.

The waves of such a war are still on their way, and they will give rise to an “economic tsunami” in Iran.

Reza Pahlavi turned his back on the “New Covenant” that he had previously presented.

Given the course of events in the country, it is natural that this government has no choice but to leave.
 

Saturday at 22:00 Iran time.

The Green Movement is the first movement in which people took to the streets for their civil rights without being called by the clergy.

Mohsen Sazegara: The slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom” was a gift from our Kurdish compatriots, and this slogan is not accidental.

This revolution remained unfinished, but it achieved one of its demands, which is the issue of compulsory dress code and women’s rights.

Mohsen Sazegara: Any process in which various segments of society, not just a single class, collectively enter the political arena and demand a change of government is a revolutionary process.
 

He created a suitable opportunity for religious opponents who were also ideologically equipped.