Abdi Media's response to the statements of the spokesman of the judiciary

With the publication of the news and explanations of the spokesperson of the judicial system, it became clear that the statements and accusations of Seyyed Mustafa Mirslim, a member of the Expediency Council, regarding his son's espionage and then connection with the Mojahedin, were false.

The seriousness of this gentleman's illness, which was claimed by his influential father, was not confirmed by the medical examiner (according to the same legal path that I wrote earlier).

Also, contrary to his father's claim that other inmates are harassing him, this particular son is still in detention center 8 of Evin prison and has not been transferred to another place, nor has anyone or any other persons been transferred to another detention center.

The spokesman of the judicial branch, of course, only for insiders; He did not announce how half of the sentence of this security prisoner with severe punishment was included in the amnesty of Ayatollah Khamenei while he was absent from leave with the proposal of the head of the judiciary?

Apart from that, according to the law and regulations of prisons, shouldn't the days of absence from leave be deducted from the sentence period and be considered as a gap?

The statements of Mr. Satayshi, who said that a decision was made to escape from his prison, are not true.

As I wrote earlier, the accusation case against the son of this member of parliament was not filed for his escape from prison, and I said that this case may be filed with the disclosure of this news.

It is worth mentioning that Mehdi Mirslim Aghazadeh Mustafa Mirslim has been absent for more than 200 days, which is considered a crime according to the Islamic Penal Code.

After the disclosure of Abdi Media as an independent media and the publication of this important news, despite the news suffocation of the domestic media and the security deterrence of the Muftafais for their silence, thanks to the virtual space and the pressure of public opinion, yesterday, August 2, 2022, the investigator of the Special Prosecutor's Office of Tehran Security and a The day before the interview, the spokesman of the judicial branch investigated this issue, and additional details will be published based on the reactions and decisions of the judicial branch.

Mr. Shoghnogo and the Director General of the Secretariat of the Judiciary know that there is a long way to go before the punishment is issued and the trial in the criminal court2 and the certainty of this verdict.

Abdi Media has not yet received the answer to the double standard of the judiciary's treatment of the accused, and this ambiguity is not only for this independent media, but this ambiguity is for the nation.

Where is the judiciary when forced confessions against the law are spread by the national media and the rights of the accused are violated?

When the accused are arrested in the investigation of the opposite side, the news is Tir Ol Fars and Tasnim and the Judiciary News Agency (Mizan). But if you are with them and have taken even the biggest security measures against your country... you will be on the safe side.

If this oppression is not obvious, then what is?

The head of the judicial system, who is looking to create a face like Beheshti, if he is not looking for a publicity show, then why does he not act in these cases of open cruelty?

The people and this independent media consider your behavior and share it honestly with the people.