The presence of an unprecedented security figure in the nuclear negotiating team; new questions about the composition of the Iranian delegation.

A simple question for Foreign Minister Dr. Araqchi.

Following the publication of images from recent sessions of the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear negotiations, the presence of a person named Dr. Valiollah Nouri in the negotiating team is the subject of my question in this note.

What is the reason for the presence of Dr. Valiullah Nouri, known by the pseudonym Brother Ranjbar, in the negotiating team and his effective record in the field of foreign policy?

I don't intend to write in more detail for now, but apart from the issues and backgrounds, although their communication and empathy with you are understandable, wouldn't it have been better if you intended to have a security expert accompany you, to select someone who firstly knows a foreign language and wouldn't need a translator in meetings, and secondly has effective experience in foreign policy?

Nuclear negotiations are not merely a diplomatic action; rather, they are undoubtedly a turning point in the contemporary history of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The decisions made in these negotiations have a direct and tangible impact on the lives of millions of Iranians: from the exchange rate of the dollar to access to medicine, from foreign investment to youth employment. In such a situation, public opinion closely scrutinizes the composition of the negotiation team, as this team is essentially the representative of national interests against global powers. Appointing individuals without the necessary experience in foreign policy or lacking minimal capability in international relations can have irrevocable consequences for the country. This concern is not a political or factional one, but rather a national one.

Given that the Islamic Republic's nuclear negotiations with the United States have a significant impact on people's lives, the presence of individuals in the negotiating team is seriously questioned and requires a convincing response to public opinion.