If the trial of Tea Debesh had been held in public, the level of people's satisfaction with the verdict against the convicts would have been higher

Read
1 minute
-Saturday 2025/03/08 - 13:03
News Code:14637
گر دادگاه‌ چای دبش علنی برگزار می شد، میزان قانع شدن مردم از حکم علیه محکومان بیشتر بود

For more than three decades, the repeated efforts and insistence of lawyers for the proper implementation of Article 165 of the Constitution 

 Hammihan newspaper wrote:

It has been more than three decades since the repeated efforts and insistence of lawyers to properly implement Article 165 of the Constitution, which emphasizes the conduct of "public trials" and considers the holding of closed trials as an exception.

The reactions to the verdicts in the Debesh tea case should be seen in this context, where the judicial verdict is no longer desired by the political supporters of the judiciary. It is precisely here that the problems of the judiciary's entry into political categories become apparent, and it becomes clear what the long-term benefits of independence are for this institution.

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up