The mayor of Neka was arrested

The head of the Mazandaran Economic Security Police said on Sunday: "One of the mayors of the east of the province was arrested by unknown soldiers of the Mazandaran Economic Security Police."

Sameh Khorshad stated: According to reports received about violations in the municipality complex of one of the cities in the east of the province, the follow-up of the issue was put on the agenda of the anonymous soldiers of the Department of Combating Economic Crimes.

He stated that the total number of people arrested in this case was two and added: "In addition to the mentioned person, one other person and a related person who was working in the field of municipal contracting was also arrested and handed over to the judicial authority in connection with this case."

The head of the Economic Security Police of Mazandaran Province noted: "The citizens of Mazandaran can register news in the field of crimes and economic corruption through the phone number 096300 of the Faraja Economic Security Police News Headquarters."

On November 4 of this year, the Chief Justice of Mazandaran announced that the former head of one of the government service offices in the city of Chalus had been arrested on charges of acquiring money through illegal means and money laundering.

Abbas Pouriani had said that according to the report of the bailiffs that numerous violations had been committed by the former head of one of the government agencies providing services in Chalous, the investigation of the matter was put on the agenda of the county prosecutor's office.

He added: "Based on this, it was determined that Masharalieh had obtained a branch by acquiring money through illegitimate means and deceiving the applicants, during which by reporting the matter to the Chalus County Prosecutor's Office, an order was issued to summon and obtain the statements of the defendant, witnesses, and informants, as well as to examine their accounts."

The Head of the Mazandaran Judiciary said: "During the investigation conducted and the response of the experts of the relevant department, the defendant attempted to settle his personal debts to the court by means of deception and deception under the guise of helping the administration, participation and cooperation, and sometimes by threatening not to hand over the branch and stopping the case, and by providing the ID of the bill and payment in handwriting or by providing the account numbers of the persons to whom he was in debt. individuals./Hamshahri