while the constitution has a conflict of interest; Ebrahim Raeesi, as the president and executor of the constitution, speaks of the constitutionality of the constitution.

Read
4 minutes
-Friday 2024/09/20 - 12:59
News Code:1812
درحالیکه قانون اساسی دارای تضاد منافع است؛ ابراهیم رئیسی بعنوان رئیسِ جمهور و مجری قانون اساسی از اتقان قانون اساسی میگوید.

Ebrahim Raeesi praises the current constitution of the Islamic Republic while not long ago the historical gaffe and conflict of interests in the amendment of the constitution was made public by Abdi Media after 33 years, but the people still preferred not to see or hear.

For this reason, we will once again review this historical mistake that was added to it in the 1989 constitutional amendment with examples of it.

The approvers of the constitutional amendment in 1989, who covered Article 57 of the constitution with the addition and inclusion of the "absolute province"; When amending Article 107 of the Constitution, which is considered to be approved by the numerical number after Article 57; They were in such a hurry as if they forgot to remove the last sentence of this principle, "The leader is equal before the laws of the country" because this clear statement; Fahwa questions the validity of Article 57 of the Constitution, which is before this Article.

In fact, the question is: Is the leadership position of anyone equal to other people according to Article 107, which is after Article 57?

Or, according to Article 57 of the Constitution, the leader himself is absolute in rulings and sometimes before the law, and his decrees, approvals, and measures precede the laws approved by the parliament?

As far as we know, the final resolution of the parliament of each country is called law and not another authority! The law has its legal definition.

Do you think that the defenders of the current constitution have studied it once completely and carefully by examining the consequences of some of its principles?

What about the revolutionary representatives of the parliament and the representatives of the previous periods from the third period onwards? Of course, why do they? Because they have accepted the customary practices and rules.

The representatives of the sessions of the Islamic Council from the third term onwards have practically agreed not to interfere in matters that are directly or indirectly related to the leadership, and if they want to interfere and either pass a law or perhaps write an investigation, after obtaining the permission of the leader of the republic Islam is done.

Of course, for a long time, in the written text of the law, which was previously used as "the position of leadership", "the position of the Supreme Leader" is used in the writing procedure of the articles of various laws.

In the affairs of the armed forces, which is considered to be in the area of ​​the General Command of the Armed Forces, the General Staff of the Armed Forces has practically taken the place of the parliament and, with the approval of the General Command of the Forces, implements and operates the adopted measures.

The promotion of the Joint Staff of the Army, which is the text of the Constitution, in Article 110, to the General Command of the Army, and the change of the Joint Staff of the Army to the Deputy Coordinator of the Army, and the transformation of the Police Force into the General Police Command, as well as the separation of offense and defense in the army, and the change of the structure of the Air Force. ... are examples of those that were created or developed without the need for permission and approval from the parliament and only have the approval of the Commander-in-Chief.

However, some believe that with the explicit inclusion of police forces in the text of the Constitution before 1991, the parliament could not integrate the police forces of that time and establish Naja, contrary to the Constitution.

Also, the creation or development of various councils, such as the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution and the Supreme Council of Cyber ​​Space, and recently the Coordination Council of the Heads of the Forces and the Corona Headquarters, etc., in addition to the Supreme National Security Council, which was established in the 1989 amendment to the Constitution, has the task of approving decrees. They are in charge of the equivalent of the law, and the parliament does not have the right to oppose their approvals, and of course, it does not have the power.

Add to these a quasi-exclusive judicial branch called the Prosecutor's Office and Special Clergy Courts, which, in addition to dealing with accusations of clerics, has a special regulation approved by Ayatollah Khamenei, which is also considered as a rule of law.

According to Article 13 of the Regulations of the Prosecutor's Office and Special Clergy Courts, this special authority will handle and have jurisdiction over cases referred by the leadership regardless of whether the persons are clerics or non-clerics.

In addition, the appointed public prosecutor, or special public prosecutor for the clergy, is appointed by the leader of the Islamic Republic, if he determines that it is expedient to deal with the accusation of any person, even if he is not a cleric, in any case in the court and the special prosecutor's office for the clergy, negating the inherent competence of other official judicial authorities, he will issue a hearing order. It will be given in this exclusive reference and other things that are not worth writing.

You read a detailed hadith about this whole and you have a country, gentlemen.

Abdollah Abdi

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up