Targeted streamlining with the capacity of legal paradoxes in the Islamic Republic and the lack of legal information of the people?

Dr. Mohsen Burhani, as an eminent and capable lawyer, trusted by the media and a legal model of many interested parties, is reminded and probably noticed my previous notes in Abdi Media that we are facing a strange paradox at the stage of disciplinary complaints against judges.

Unfortunately, neither the judiciary nor the parliament have taken any action to correct this paradox, and it is as if they consider it advisable to maintain the status quo.

This means that even if a disciplinary complaint is filed against the offending judge and he is convicted in the prosecutor's office and the supreme disciplinary court of judges, and the verdict is final, it does not affect the outcome of the complained case!!!!

It is even more strange that even this criminal conviction is not an example of a retrial.

However, the spirit of this public tweet, Mr. Ostad, is a valuable suggestion that the vice president of supervision and evaluation of the Judges' Disciplinary Prosecutor's Office directly enter into the accusation and trial case of Ruhollah Ajamian and investigate if there have been any violations.

However, since the professor himself is also a lawyer in this case, it is appropriate, and of course, if he has discretion, with the permission of the first paragraph of Article 22 of the Law on Supervision of the Conduct of Judges, by filing an official disciplinary complaint with Mr. Qadiani, the disciplinary prosecutor of the judges, the subject of the claims and objections attributed to the judicial board. The first branch of the Karaj Revolutionary Court will follow up.

or at least in a documented form in the form of a report to the head of the judiciary or the head of the Supreme Court or even the 39th branch of the Supreme Court in the capacity of the branch handling appeals or directly to the judicial prosecutor of the judges so that according to the provisions of Article 22 of the law on monitoring The behavior of the judges to take action.

However, since the rulings are not yet finalized, the professor will follow the issue with courage in the stages of appeal and after that, the retrial from the Supreme Court with legal and jurisprudential documents that they have special mastery over.

But now again a paradox has formed in my weak mind is the honorable and virtuous professor who is trusted by many media not aware of these things or is the practice of popular tweets and targeted streaming with the capacity of legal paradoxes of the Islamic Republic continuing as before?