A document is published by a famous media network.

Abdollah Abdi - Abdi Media

The relevant and official authorities of the Islamic Republic deliberately maintain a silence and do not respond in a timely, precise, convincing, and documented manner.

The discussion surrounding this, whether in favor of or against the document and its context, intensifies in the virtual space.

I emphasize that this environment significantly aligns with the broader, desired policy of the Islamic Republic.

In this context, targeted and monitored activists become the best excuse and prey for intelligence agencies, and some are summoned to the judiciary after being reported to the prosecutor's office.

The Attorney General also threatens media outlets with activating the Press Supervisory Board, along with other issues that I will not mention for now.

I stress that, considering past incidents like Kahrizak, I do not dismiss any possibility of occurrences in detention centers or any other authorities. However, note that all my statements pertain to documents and security-intelligence games, and nothing else.

Disregarding the writing chaos and other issues, if—and I emphasize if—addressing this matter has been assigned to the IRGC, and not to another authority, unfortunately, no one paid attention that this referral and examination fall under the jurisdiction and duties of the IRGC's Intelligence Protection Organization (Hafasa) and cannot be addressed or examined by the IRGC's Intelligence Organization (Etasa).

These two organizations have significant structural and mission-related differences in terms of authority and structure.

What is stated on the alleged reconstructed letterhead is from the "Intelligence Organization" of the IRGC and not the Intelligence Protection Organization.

I still don’t understand why, for the sake of exposing information, a document needs to be reconstructed?!!! Exposing information with a reconstructed document and without initial declaration is a new phenomenon for me.

This is the most basic matter in dealing with internal organizational issues, where the relevant authority for handling matters within judicial, military, security, and intelligence bodies is the protection intelligence of the concerned organization, not the intelligence.

A year ago, before the tragedy of Mahsa Amini's death, I explained in a note titled "Security Puzzle" that security institutions, by sending fake documents to the media, aim to delegitimize them and erode public trust.

The goal of the Islamic Republic is for political and virtual activists and activists to distrust each other, so that no one knows if the other side is part of intelligence projects or truly represents their real selves.

Do you think they have really been unsuccessful?

Who do you genuinely trust today—what person, media outlet, or leader?

Now we arrive at the goal of the Islamic Republic regarding the recent events specifically surrounding this document:

Controlling activists and then diminishing the standing of political and civil activists.

With the logic and justification that as a political activist who claims the Islamic Republic should either go or be reformed, you cannot even distinguish between an authentic and a fake document.

At the very least, gentlemen, activists inside and some senior managers of the Islamic Republic, you are being manipulated by minor intelligence designs, and you do not recognize the intelligence structure and the competent authority for addressing these matters.

So what do you expect?

These games and waves of various forms are repeated daily, and unfortunately, many knowingly and unknowingly fall into the trap.

Isn’t it beautiful? I don’t know, but I know it is very bitter