Special note - addressed to Mr. Abbas Abdi

  It must have been approved by Ayatollah Khamenei, and the structure of the Afaf and Hijab camp, as well as several other camps without names and public signs, whose identity and structure are not known correctly, except for the Secretariat of S.A.A.M.  and the military office of the Commander-in-Chief.

In such a way that a number of the aforementioned bases have such cross-border power that they have the right to sign and correspond directly with the authorities on behalf of the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces.

Unfortunately, in cyberspace, 3 things are not paid attention to intentionally or unintentionally:

First: The Ministry of Interior is the host and the secretariat of the National Security Council provides information in the capacity of the secretariat of that council, not just the headquarters of the Ministry of Interior.

Second: many lawyers and cyberspace activists consider only the law passed by the parliament in 1362 as a criterion for action and believe that this council does not have all these powers in the new era;  While I mentioned in that note, during different periods (and not only recently), the Supreme National Security Council has updated the powers and structure of the Security Council according to the latest part of Article 176 of the Constitution.

Although this update of media structure and authority has not been done, my biggest surprise is that the ministers of the country who were the head of the security council of their period, or the secretaries of the Supreme National Security Council, or the intelligence ministers of the periods, or the obvious security figures but informed and active in the space  virtual;  Like Mr. Salehi Amiri, Ashna, Pour Mohammadi, Rabiei, Ali Hashemi, etc., have they remained silent in such situations and cases!!?

At least these gentlemen, if they have any other claim, they should announce now that this note is not true and deny it if it is not true.

Third: Contrary to the resolutions of the Supreme National Security Council, the resolutions of the National Security Council can be appealed to the Court of Administrative Justice.

Even if the resolution is confidential and very confidential, the court directly demands the resolution, and in the case of secret and higher documents, it is approved with the approval of the head of the judiciary.

But which claimant has taken action through the legal channels and available capacities and has made this action known in the media?  So that at least regardless of the outcome of the court's decision, the response of the Ministry of Interior and specifically the National Security Council to the court will be clarified that the approvals of which institution and upper authority in the country are issued from the pen, focus and language of S.A.K.?

It is strange that I, a simple reporter, see and write these axioms stated in the existing law, but respected and intellectual people of law do not talk about it, or jurists don't express these obvious and tangible facts.

Sometimes I am convinced that these marginalizations and maneuvers are a security show for many purposes, but they are all desirable