Zaid Abadi's irony to the Spokesman of the Guardian Council: Is this language of law and arbitration?

  Following the release of Mir Hossein Mousavi's statement after the two -day war and proposing a referendum, a spokesman for the Guardian Council responded, saying, "How to adhere to the outcome and accept the result this time?"  In response to these statements, Ahmad Zaidabadi wrote: "Is this kind of talk, the language of a guardian council jurist or the leader of a rival political party?"

In response to today's remarks by the Guardian Council, Ahmad Zaydabadi wrote in a note on his telegram channel about the referendum proposal by Mir Hossein Mousavi:

"How do they adhere to the outcome and accept the result?"  Mr Nazif, a jurist of the Guardian Council, said in a statement: "Those who did not comply with the law in a regular election and did not even adhere to their own suggestions at the time are now talking about a referendum."  Is this kind of speaking and speaking the language of a guardian council jurist or the leader of a rival political party?

In fact, the main root of the problems that arose in the year 88 is the interference of political competition in the legal entity, which, according to its arbitrary position, must be 100 % neutral to political competitions and escape the stance against or against the political forces as if they were fleeing!  In fact, with this political tone, Mr. Nazif has unwittingly given the right to him instead of sarving on Mir Hossein!