A group of lawyers and jurists apparently sent a letter published in "Emtada" from the special prosecutor for the clergy, which has not been specified whether it means the prosecutor appointed by Mohseni Ajieh or the special prosecutor for the clergy of T

In addition to paying attention to all my notes in Abdi Media in this connection and special "hints" towards Sheikh Kazem Siddiqui and his continued justice in the Friday Imamate of Tehran and remaining in his other seminary and staff responsibilities, it should be seen how the special prosecutor of Tehran's clergy will react to this. Will there be a request/complaint/report?

Because the public prosecutor and the revolution of Tehran, which does not have the authority to deal with possible accusations against clerics.

In particular, the new spokesperson of the Judiciary recently announced in his press conference that a case with Haj Mr. Sediqi's report against others in the Judiciary has been filed and is being investigated.

But the important thing is that:

In contrast, a number of names such as Mr. Ali Sharifzadeh Ardakani, Mr. Mustafa Nili, Mr. Hassan Shabani-nejad, and Mr. Mustafa Dazheh have not been signed.

Have these respectable lawyers not accepted the published text or are they aware of its practical and final result?

If their signatures were not obtained, why were their names published in the final version?

And do the mentioned persons know about such a letter and its publication and what is their opinion?

And the next point:

In the case of Mrs. Mehdakht Damghanpour, it is signed "on behalf of" and what does this mean legally?

And the last point:

This is a complaint letter and the signatory lawyers are aware of the details of the accusations and documents and the investigation of the high officials of the system. Is it considered?