Bolton III or Obama's second?

Read
1 minute
-Sunday 2025/05/11 - 14:01
News Code:17870
 بولتون سوم یا اوبامای دوم؟

The key point that Wittekind should pay attention to is that nothing is more dangerous for non-proliferation than idle nuclear scientists.

Ali Vaez, an analyst on Iran at the International Crisis Group: The key point that Witkoff must pay attention to is that nothing is more dangerous for non-proliferation than idle nuclear scientists. Preserving Iran's dignity in an agreement is in the interests of U.S. national security, because unfair agreements lead to the emergence of unreliable parties in the agreement.The U.S. president can achieve a deal that is significantly better than the JCPOA if he remains indifferent to the warmongers calling for maximalist demands. However, insisting on absolute positions with a history of repeated failures will lead us more towards a 'Bolton version three' than a 'second Obama version'.

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up