With what logic does Mr. Izadi disagree with the military's message of peace but agrees with their message of war?
Ahmad Zeidabadi wrote on his Telegram channel:
In fact, the only correct word in Mr. Izadi's remarks is the last sentence, namely the necessity of non-interference of military forces in cultural, economic, and diplomatic affairs.
But does he really believe that? If he says yes, then why has he not so far made the slightest criticism of the generals who consider it their intrinsic duty to interfere in all aspects of the country, including its politics, economy, and culture?
Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up